It is currently May 2nd, 2024, 11:19 pm
Report bugs with the Rainmeter application and suggest features.
wand3r0r
Posts: 3 Joined: July 5th, 2010, 11:29 pm
Post
by wand3r0r » July 6th, 2010, 12:08 am
I'm using the code:
Code: Select all
[MeasureCPU23]
Measure=CPU
processor=23
InvertMeasure=1
[MeterCPUText23]
Meter=String
MeasureName=MeasureCPU23
X=5
Y=5R
W=105
H=15
FontColor=#Color2#
Text="CPU23: %1%"
AntiAlias=1
[MeterCPUGraph23]
Meter=bar
MeasureName=MeasureCPU23
X=100
Y=r
W=100
H=15
SolidColor=#Color3#
BarColor=#Color4#
BarOrientation=HORIZONTAL
this is returning results when i obviously dont have a 23 core processor.
this isnt my main concern however. what has been bothering me is: since this doesnt return an error can the readings from my other 22 cores
be trusted?
jsmorley
Developer
Posts: 22631 Joined: April 19th, 2009, 11:02 pm
Location: Fort Hunt, Virginia, USA
Post
by jsmorley » July 6th, 2010, 12:19 am
wand3r0r wrote: I'm using the code:
Code: Select all
[MeasureCPU23]
Measure=CPU
processor=23
InvertMeasure=1
[MeterCPUText23]
Meter=String
MeasureName=MeasureCPU23
X=5
Y=5R
W=105
H=15
FontColor=#Color2#
Text="CPU23: %1%"
AntiAlias=1
[MeterCPUGraph23]
Meter=bar
MeasureName=MeasureCPU23
X=100
Y=r
W=100
H=15
SolidColor=#Color3#
BarColor=#Color4#
BarOrientation=HORIZONTAL
this is returning results when i obviously dont have a 23 core processor.
this isnt my main concern however. what has been bothering me is: since this doesnt return an error can the readings from my other 22 cores
be trusted?
If Processor= is missing or invalid, the measure will return the average of all actual cores.
wand3r0r
Posts: 3 Joined: July 5th, 2010, 11:29 pm
Post
by wand3r0r » July 6th, 2010, 1:41 am
so processor "23" is the same as Measure=CPU?
jsmorley
Developer
Posts: 22631 Joined: April 19th, 2009, 11:02 pm
Location: Fort Hunt, Virginia, USA
Post
by jsmorley » July 6th, 2010, 2:18 am
wand3r0r wrote: so processor "23" is the same as Measure=CPU?
Seems to be....
poiru
Developer
Posts: 2872 Joined: April 17th, 2009, 12:18 pm
Post
by poiru » July 6th, 2010, 6:08 am
wand3r0r wrote: since this doesnt return an error can the readings from my other 22 cores
be trusted?
If you look at the log, something like this will be there:
Code: Select all
DEBUG: (00:00:11.388) [mCPU] Invalid Processor: 10