It is currently April 19th, 2019, 7:21 pm

RainRGB 4.0

Plugins and Addons popular with the Community
User avatar
raiguard
Posts: 591
Joined: June 25th, 2015, 7:02 pm
Location: The Sky, USA

Re: RainRGB 4.0

raiguard » April 4th, 2019, 12:08 am

Hey, I have a small request.

Would it be possible for the runcommand version to return the current variable value, rather than nothing, if the program is exited or the Cancel is pressed? This would prevent overwriting a color value with the measure's section variable. Thanks!
”We are pretty sure that r2922 resolves the regression in resolution caused by a reversion to a revision.” - jsmorley, 2017
User avatar
jsmorley
Developer
Posts: 19178
Joined: April 19th, 2009, 11:02 pm
Location: Fort Hunt, Virginia, USA

Re: RainRGB 4.0

jsmorley » April 4th, 2019, 12:19 am

raiguard wrote:
April 4th, 2019, 12:08 am
Hey, I have a small request.

Would it be possible for the runcommand version to return the current variable value, rather than nothing, if the program is exited or the Cancel is pressed? This would prevent overwriting a color value with the measure's section variable. Thanks!
Sorry, nope. No further changes can be made to this addon at all, as the code will no longer compile in recent versions of AutoIt, and it's just way, way, too complicated to figure out why.

It is what it is...
User avatar
raiguard
Posts: 591
Joined: June 25th, 2015, 7:02 pm
Location: The Sky, USA

Re: RainRGB 4.0

raiguard » April 4th, 2019, 12:27 am

jsmorley wrote:
April 4th, 2019, 12:19 am
Sorry, nope. No further changes can be made to this addon at all, as the code will no longer compile in recent versions of AutoIt, and it's just way, way, too complicated to figure out why.

It is what it is...
Well that's a shame, thanks anyway. I managed to find a workaround.
”We are pretty sure that r2922 resolves the regression in resolution caused by a reversion to a revision.” - jsmorley, 2017
User avatar
jsmorley
Developer
Posts: 19178
Joined: April 19th, 2009, 11:02 pm
Location: Fort Hunt, Virginia, USA

Re: RainRGB 4.0

jsmorley » April 4th, 2019, 12:45 am

Good. I have moved away from using RainRGB for myself. I prefer this:

https://forum.rainmeter.net/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=26884#p140450


It's entirely in Rainmeter / Lua and Rainmeter plugin code, so it can be modified any way you want to.
User avatar
raiguard
Posts: 591
Joined: June 25th, 2015, 7:02 pm
Location: The Sky, USA

Re: RainRGB 4.0

raiguard » April 4th, 2019, 1:05 am

Ooo that's cool, I'll poke around with it. Thanks!
”We are pretty sure that r2922 resolves the regression in resolution caused by a reversion to a revision.” - jsmorley, 2017
User avatar
StArL0rd84
Posts: 310
Joined: February 8th, 2015, 10:07 pm
Location: EU, Denmark.

Re: RainRGB 4.0

StArL0rd84 » April 4th, 2019, 11:01 am

[
raiguard wrote:
April 4th, 2019, 12:08 am
Hey, I have a small request.

Would it be possible for the runcommand version to return the current variable value, rather than nothing, if the program is exited or the Cancel is pressed? This would prevent overwriting a color value with the measure's section variable. Thanks!

I have put a substitute option on mine to return the current color instead of nothing when dismissed. But you probably came to the same conclusion.

Substitute="":"#currentcolor#"
(#WorkTime# = 1 ? #Work# : ([mEnergyLoss:%] > 100 ? #SleepMode# : #Rainmeter#))
User avatar
raiguard
Posts: 591
Joined: June 25th, 2015, 7:02 pm
Location: The Sky, USA

Re: RainRGB 4.0

raiguard » April 4th, 2019, 11:10 am

StArL0rd84 wrote:
April 4th, 2019, 11:01 am
[


I have put a substitute option on mine to return the current color instead of nothing when dismissed. But you probably came to the same conclusion.

Substitute="":"#currentcolor#"
O.O

Why didn't I think of that!? My workaround was so much more complicated... Thanks! :D
”We are pretty sure that r2922 resolves the regression in resolution caused by a reversion to a revision.” - jsmorley, 2017
User avatar
StArL0rd84
Posts: 310
Joined: February 8th, 2015, 10:07 pm
Location: EU, Denmark.

Re: RainRGB 4.0

StArL0rd84 » April 4th, 2019, 11:16 am

raiguard wrote:
April 4th, 2019, 11:10 am
O.O

Why didn't I think of that!? My workaround was so much more complicated... Thanks! :D
No problemo. 👍
(#WorkTime# = 1 ? #Work# : ([mEnergyLoss:%] > 100 ? #SleepMode# : #Rainmeter#))