So it seems that this solution can be used only where the value increases by one up!jsmorley wrote: Yes. Exactly what I got. The other thing that I was never aware of is that it doesn't "wrap" from say 3 to 1, but "reverses" back through 2 to get from 3 to 1, while again "skipping" transition frames as you saw. So this option is one that might be useful in some cases, for "morphing" an image based on some measure value, but probably isn't any good for "digits" due to the behavior.
It is currently May 21st, 2024, 8:36 pm
BitmapTransitionFrames?
-
wiedzmawiedzma
- Posts: 112
- Joined: August 18th, 2012, 5:19 pm
Re: BitmapTransitionFrames?
-
jsmorley
- Developer
- Posts: 22634
- Joined: April 19th, 2009, 11:02 pm
- Location: Fort Hunt, Virginia, USA
Re: BitmapTransitionFrames?
Correct, but even then it is strange if you go 1, 2, 3, 1.wiedzmawiedzma wrote: So it seems that this solution can be used only where the value increases by one up!
-
wiedzmawiedzma
- Posts: 112
- Joined: August 18th, 2012, 5:19 pm
Re: BitmapTransitionFrames?
But when it comes to Measure = Time of BitmapExtend = 1 appears to work properly even with 0, 1, 2, 3, 0.jsmorley wrote: Correct, but even then it is strange if you go 1, 2, 3, 1.