![Smiler :)](./images/smilies/ab.gif)
It is currently September 8th, 2024, 12:17 am
Can't pass measure value to web parser
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: March 15th, 2024, 7:30 pm
Re: Can't pass measure value to web parser
Thank you. I guess I understood. ![Smiler :)](./images/smilies/ab.gif)
![Smiler :)](./images/smilies/ab.gif)
-
- Rainmeter Sage
- Posts: 8030
- Joined: February 27th, 2015, 2:38 pm
- Location: Terra Yincognita
Re: Can't pass measure value to web parser
You're welcome, feel free to ask if there's any area where things are not clear enough to understand.
![Thumbs Up :thumbup:](./images/smilies/ay.gif)
-
- Rainmeter Sage
- Posts: 16499
- Joined: October 11th, 2010, 6:27 pm
- Location: Gheorgheni, Romania
Re: Can't pass measure value to web parser
I think normally it shouldn't, however there might be thousands of details, which should be taken into account. So, not sure, depends...Kotofanchik wrote: ↑July 6th, 2024, 11:30 pm Should counters or measures that depend on a counter set via !SetOption bang be dynamic variables? Is it enough if they also do !UpdateMeter (measure)?
And let's add one more thing: a while (a decade or more) ago, setting the dynamic variables did count most probably, but in meantime both computers and OS have evolved into a point on which maybe the dynamic variables should have to become default. Most probably the backward compatibility might complicate this, but as far as I see, doesn't really matter if you set the dynamic variables on each meter and each measure of a skin, this doesn't load too much the computer.Yincognito wrote: ↑July 7th, 2024, 1:03 pm Personally, I often don't bother much with all the exceptions and just use DynamicVariables=1 wherever I'm dealing with a changing #variable# or [measure]. Just like you, I also thought about converting my skins into not using DynamicVariables=1 at all in the past, via bangs and !SetOptions, but it's quite an effort for a relatively small gain, it often increases the length of bangs, and in some more complex cases it's just not feasible or possible to do it.![]()
Might be wrong, but this is how I see things now...
-
- Rainmeter Sage
- Posts: 8030
- Joined: February 27th, 2015, 2:38 pm
- Location: Terra Yincognita
Re: Can't pass measure value to web parser
Indeed. It only becomes significant if the skin itself is already resource intensive. All these effects are cumulative.
-
- Rainmeter Sage
- Posts: 16499
- Joined: October 11th, 2010, 6:27 pm
- Location: Gheorgheni, Romania
Re: Can't pass measure value to web parser
As I see this question, on a decent computer, running a Windows 10 or 11, there is no way to load the computer too much by dynamic variables. My guess, at least.Yincognito wrote: ↑July 7th, 2024, 8:24 pm Indeed. It only becomes significant if the skin itself is already resource intensive. All these effects are cumulative.
-
- Rainmeter Sage
- Posts: 8030
- Joined: February 27th, 2015, 2:38 pm
- Location: Terra Yincognita