Effect: The "image" size doesn't get past 100% of its original size, despite the "dynamic" window size. Note: Don't bother testing hardcoded TM values, I tried already and it's the same story.
Last edited by Yincognito on July 9th, 2021, 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yincognito wrote: ↑July 9th, 2021, 3:57 pmEffect: The "image" size doesn't get past 100% of its original size, despite the "dynamic" window size. Note: Don't bother testing hardcoded TM values, I tried already and it's the same story.
Tester_1.rmskin
This will clear the confusion.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Actually, this might just be the expected behavior, on a second thought - so it's definitely not a bug:
Also note that the even if the meter's visual location and orientation is changed by the transformation the place where it would be located without the transformation will still be used to define the window size and register the mouse clicks.
Probably not the confusion death.crafter referred to (i.e. the manually set W and H restricting the viewport), but still a mistake: mine. So, disregard this fake bug report.
death.crafter wrote: ↑July 9th, 2021, 5:31 pm
Guess I was wrong.
Well, I was wrong as well, just on a slightly different thing. Don't worry, at least we realized that (and where) we were wrong. Better luck next time.