Please test it and let us know what's going on.
However, guys, have you noticed we are on off topic?
Please test it and let us know what's going on.
Not really, since as I mentioned, I do have such a case in the code I posted for the OP. Plus, I don't think he'll mind us talking about this, since his problem is essentially solved.
Yeah, probably...Yincognito wrote: ↑April 15th, 2019, 7:27 pm Not really, since as I mentioned, I do have such a case in the code I posted for the OP. Plus, I don't think he'll mind us talking about this, since his problem is essentially solved.
After brief testing on your example, I am not seeing update-on-enable, though I am sure that I did see that action in my own work some time back. However, I am out of time right now, and bow to your guys' superior experience!
Could be that what you saw was just the regular update of the measure on the following update cycle? Just guessing here...
A disabled measure can be updated. A classical example of needing a such action is when you want to restart a counting measure.Yincognito wrote: ↑April 15th, 2019, 7:32 pm Could be that what you saw was just the regular update of the measure on the following update cycle? Just guessing here...
EDIT: Although, if I think about it, I'm not sure the measure will even be enabled, if not updated with a bang afterwards... By the way, I was so affected by my experience with this that I even !UpdateMeasure after disabling it! Just to be sure, you know...
Code: Select all
[Rainmeter]
Update=1000
DynamicWindowSize=1
AccurateText=1
[Timer]
Measure=Calc
Formula=( Timer + 1 )
[MeterTest]
Meter=String
MeasureName=Timer
FontSize=12
FontWeight=400
FontColor=255,255,255,255
SolidColor=47,47,47,255
Padding=15,5,15,5
AntiAlias=1
Text=%1
That's exactly the type of measure I experienced that behavior with. And that's exactly why I disabled the measure, to reset it (or better said, set it to 0). Talking about coincidences...
I still hereYincognito wrote: ↑April 15th, 2019, 7:27 pm Not really, since as I mentioned, I do have such a case in the code I posted for the OP. Plus, I don't think he'll mind us talking about this, since his problem is essentially solved.
Of course you are. Just like I'm also pleased to see that the OP (you, that is) just gave his official support for going off topic.