There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.
I'm not a huge fan of using percentages in WindowX / WindowY / AnchorX / AnchorY in Rainmeter.ini to position skins on the screen, as they would need to be set that way in any Layout that uses the skin, and if you drag the skin somewhere else, those values are lost in Rainmeter.ini until you once again load the Layout. They are fine for distributing a suite of skins that should be positioned in particular spots on the screen and relative to each other, but you are likely going to want to turn draggable off in Rainmeter.ini for them as well, so they are always in a "fixed" position.
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.
Mor3bane wrote:Thanks jsmorely - I was trying to use that formula in the image X & Y - and it was going wonky. Yours works great. Thanks.
If you are using something like FileView or QuotePlugin to dynamically change the image every xx seconds, it will be most efficient to do something like:
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.