Happy if any of our suggestions were able to help get you thinking of an approach that works for you!
It is currently April 27th, 2024, 12:38 am
Group1 | Group2 ToggleMeterGroup and on/off Status
-
eclectic-tech
- Rainmeter Sage
- Posts: 5407
- Joined: April 12th, 2012, 9:40 pm
- Location: Cedar Point, Ohio, USA
Re: Group1 | Group2 ToggleMeterGroup and on/off Status
I figured your skin was a be a bit more complicated than what you posted... nice work!
Happy if any of our suggestions were able to help get you thinking of an approach that works for you!
Happy if any of our suggestions were able to help get you thinking of an approach that works for you!
:: My DA Gallery :: Rainmeter DA Gallery :: Rainmeter Workshops :: Rainmeter Documentation :: BBCode Guide ::
-
Mor3bane
- Posts: 943
- Joined: May 7th, 2016, 7:32 am
Re: Group1 | Group2 ToggleMeterGroup and on/off Status
Thanks, and most definitely. The time everyone puts in on this forum is kaleidoscopically awesome.eclectic-tech wrote:I figured your skin was a be a bit more complicated than what you posted... nice work!
Happy if any of our suggestions were able to help get you thinking of an approach that works for you!
Desktop hobbyists are a right decent lot of people
My DevArt Gallery
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.