I know, right.fonpaolo wrote:Oh, sorry, never used "Angle" with Inline... I used it for almost everything but "Angle".
It is currently April 18th, 2024, 9:42 am
RegExp Perl Friendly Characters [Solved]
-
Mor3bane
- Posts: 943
- Joined: May 7th, 2016, 7:32 am
Re: RegExp Perl Friendly Characters [Solved]
My DevArt Gallery
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.
-
fonpaolo
- Moderator
- Posts: 1387
- Joined: April 11th, 2013, 8:08 pm
- Location: Italy
Re: RegExp Perl Friendly Characters [Solved]
Now that I think about it, I remember when, playing with Inline, I tried to use "StingAlign"...
I can understand you.
I can understand you.
-
Mor3bane
- Posts: 943
- Joined: May 7th, 2016, 7:32 am
Re: RegExp Perl Friendly Characters [Solved]
Hahahahafonpaolo wrote:Now that I think about it, I remember when, playing with Inline, I tried to use "StingAlign"...
I can understand you.
My DevArt Gallery
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.
-
balala
- Rainmeter Sage
- Posts: 16143
- Joined: October 11th, 2010, 6:27 pm
- Location: Gheorgheni, Romania
Re: RegExp Perl Friendly Characters [Solved]
Inline can't be used to set the Angle. For this, you indeed have to use different string meters.
-
Mor3bane
- Posts: 943
- Joined: May 7th, 2016, 7:32 am
Re: RegExp Perl Friendly Characters [Solved]
Yep.balala wrote:Inline can't be used to set the Angle. For this, you indeed have to use different string meters.
My DevArt Gallery
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.
There are many ways to be different - there is only one way to be yourself - be amazing at it
The law of averages says what it means; even if you get everything right, you will get something wrong. Therefore; self managing error trapping initiates another set of averages - amongst the errors, some of them will not be errors, instead those instances will appear to be "luck". One cannot complain of the 'appearance' of 'infinite regress of causation', even if it does not have a predictable pattern, only that it requires luck to achieve.