It is currently July 13th, 2020, 9:00 pm

Pardon our dust

Discussion about the documentation, main Rainmeter site and forums.
MikeG621
Posts: 77
Joined: March 18th, 2013, 1:59 pm

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by MikeG621 »

Can you make the content wider with a percentage instead of what is likely a fixed width? On a 1920px monitor width it's only using the middle 1000px or so.
poiru
Developer
Posts: 2875
Joined: April 17th, 2009, 12:18 pm

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by poiru »

MikeG621 wrote:Can you make the content wider with a percentage instead of what is likely a fixed width? On a 1920px monitor width it's only using the middle 1000px or so.
This is intentional. Reading longer lines is harder.
User avatar
Mordasius
Posts: 1072
Joined: January 22nd, 2011, 4:23 pm
Location: GMT +8

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by Mordasius »

Stylish, however, for my taste I'd like to see:

1) The outer white-ish colour a shade darker to make the posts stand out more for those of us using wide-screen monitors.

2) A darker green for code text, maybe the same as the snippet colour. The current light green is a tad tricky to read and seems to trivialise the code segments.

3) Some sort of border around the quote sections or a slimmer quote section. As it is, it can be hard to see where the quote ends and the reply begins - particularly if the quote spans more than a few lines.

4) How about a white question mark on a light-grey background for those without avatars. The current white question mark on a dark-blue background is a little too attention grabbing for my taste.

Cheers.
poiru
Developer
Posts: 2875
Joined: April 17th, 2009, 12:18 pm

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by poiru »

JohnBurns wrote:I'm finding the orange very difficult to read - can you make it a darker shade? Thanks.
We got rid of most of the oranges used in links.
User avatar
JohnBurns
Posts: 61
Joined: February 11th, 2011, 4:18 pm
Location: Oklahoma City

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by JohnBurns »

Thanks - much better I appreciate it.
Microsoft Windows 10 x64 v2004 (OS Build 19041.264
Resident: Windows Defender, Cox McAfee Total Protection, Malwarebytes Premium 4.1.0, Windows UAC at highest level, HitmanProAlert 3.8.1
On Demand: Emisisoft Emergency Kit, MRT
Backup: Macrium Reflect Home 7.2 (Daily), Bvckup2 Pro (Continuous)
Browser: Vivaldi
Desktop: Open Shell, Rainmeter
User avatar
FreeRaider
Posts: 794
Joined: November 20th, 2012, 11:58 pm

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by FreeRaider »

I sincerely hope that the author of the old style update it and that you put it on.
User avatar
fonpaolo
Moderator
Posts: 1397
Joined: April 11th, 2013, 8:08 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by fonpaolo »

poiru wrote: This is intentional. Reading longer lines is harder.
Sorry, but, as I stated in many other forums, all with similar layouts:
since nowadays the most used monitor width is 1920, almost half of our display is completely empty.

...and also, sorry, but all the "new" forums I'm attending now, are almost identical.
Just change some color gradients, title and maybe add a banner or two and you can hardly notice the difference between them. :(
User avatar
jsmorley
Developer
Posts: 21023
Joined: April 19th, 2009, 11:02 pm
Location: Fort Hunt, Virginia, USA

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by jsmorley »

fonpaolo wrote: Sorry, but, as I stated in many other forums, all with similar layouts:
since nowadays the most used monitor width is 1920, almost half of our display is completely empty.
You are entitled to your opinion of course, but that is exactly the point being made. It is annoying and difficult to read posts that are the full 1920 width of the screen. Go go to most decent "content" sites, like CNN or Lifehacker or Slashdot or Google News or just about anywhere else, and the "content" is not full width, but in fact is about 960px, which is what we are using. Now we don't have tons of advertising as "sidebars" filling up the rest of the screen width, but that is not a bad thing, it's a very good thing. Reading articles, or posts in this case, work best if they are more or less track your eyes like a "book". Full-width would be a very strange format in my view for this kind of content.

Anyway, I'm sorry if you really hate it, but we are just not going to make the forum full-width. In fact, this theme was full-width by default, and we very quickly changed it.
User avatar
fonpaolo
Moderator
Posts: 1397
Joined: April 11th, 2013, 8:08 pm
Location: Italy

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by fonpaolo »

No, I neither said to use the full width, nor that I hate this layout.
I'm not even here to teach you how design your forum.

I only said that, to me, now all the forums are very similar, design, color, dimensions.

At least here the overall size is normal.
Elsewhere, you can have four replies in a page, with a lot of space between every line of text, then add titles and banners: you've to scroll a lot just to read a post...
...and most of the other functions (emoticons, notifications, and so on) were broken from the beginning and after a year or even more they were never been fixed.

So, no, this forum is much better, improvable, but much better.
User avatar
lysy1993lbn
Posts: 289
Joined: July 25th, 2011, 9:53 am
Location: Lublin, Poland

Re: Pardon our dust

Post by lysy1993lbn »

You can always modify css for yourself, easiest with Stylish extension. It's avaliable for Firefox, Chrome and Opera.

Ready code for Firefox

Code: Select all

@-moz-document domain("forum.rainmeter.net") {
.page-width {
    max-width: 100% !important;
}}
"Never argue with an idiot, he will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."
my deviantART | Alternative Rainmeter tray icons