balala wrote:...
Probably I have to study the Rotate parameter of the Shape meters, because I'm not familiar with it, for me the TransformationMatrix is much - much easier.
...
It's like Rotator, more or less.
balala wrote:...
Probably I have to study the Rotate parameter of the Shape meters, because I'm not familiar with it, for me the TransformationMatrix is much - much easier.
Yeah, you are right about my [m360] measure balala (I modded it right before posting, and it's not the way I usually change directions... my bad! )fonpaolo wrote:
...
It's like Rotator, more or less.
Are you talking about the Rotate parameter?fonpaolo wrote:It's like Rotator, more or less.
Thanks eclectic-tech.eclectic-tech wrote:Yeah, you are right about my [m360] measure balala (I modded it right before posting, and it's not the way I usually change directions... my bad! )
...
My compliments to balala on his comments to implement TransformationMatrix code; without seeing his solutions, I would never be able to begin to grasp it.
Yes, I've tried both, and they look quite similar if not equal.balala wrote:Are you talking about the Rotate parameter?
I'm sorry, but to be honest, I don't think I fully understand what are you talking about. What have you tried? The Rotate parameter (take care it's Rotate, not Rotator, as you've wrote and which is a meter type) of the Shape meter and the TransformationMatrix?fonpaolo wrote:Yes, I've tried both, and they look quite similar if not equal.